Strange steam making

The beauty of steam is that any heat source makes it.  Once made it becomes power.  Historically heat came from wood, then coal, then hydrocarbons, and then nuclear fusion, or is it fission, and now it is going back to  wood, a carbohydrate made of glucose molecules, and solar energy.  For some people it appears that making steam with heat is either too simple or too complex because they want to do it some other way.

I am going to list the other methods with the comment that they are uniformly bad ideas.  Most of the time I attempt to be polite and diplomatic.  It is a struggle.  We do not have the time, space, or psychic energy to be polite today.

The first bad idea is cavitation.  Someone figured out that a metal cylinder with gouges milled into it with an end mill and when submerged in a tank of water and rotated at high speeds so that cavitation–the forming and collapsing of steam bubbles–happens a lot will turn mechanical power into steam with over 90% efficiency.  Therefore they want to make steam that way forgetting that the rotating power is usually an electric motor and the main reason to make steam is to generate electricty and thus this exercise in the conservation of energy and thermodynamics will barely and with good luck end up with 20% of the electricity started with.  It is an idea, just not a good one.

The next bad idea is microwaves.  Someone read that microwaves heat water at a high degree of efficiency and thus we need to make steam that way.  Similar comments can be made about conservation of energy as the above paragraph.  What one concludes is that steam has a magical attraction to many people.  It would be more convenient if those people excited about steam had taken physics in high school.

Another method of confusing energy is to use electricity to make steam.  We are blessed with two ways: the most obvious is a resistance wire and if one does not like that then there is a way to take alternating current and bounce it back and forth between two plates immersed in water, heating it by some means of internal friction.  The efficiencies of turning electricity into heat into steam do not need to be addressed because the overall efficiency is bad.  If a person gained some advantage in torque or power transmission or drive train and drive cycle efficiency over using electricity directly then one might make an argument for this long way around the barn.  Electricity, no friend of mine, appears to be a reliable method of generating large amounts of torque; at least good enough to operate heavy freight trains.

The latest way I heard of recently is ultrasound.  There is little that I can say at this point in the discussion because of the mental exhaustion induced by the above interesting ideas.



This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Strange steam making

  1. stevebb says:

    Agree with you that these systems are bad when the energy to make the steam could be converted to end “use” much easier in other ways. However if

    Don’t know of any processes that produces waste alternating dielectric fields, nor waste ultra sound, but there are sources of waste shaft power. Regenerative braking utilises otherwise wasted shaft power. A cavitation boiler in series with a convential boiler is probably bulkier slightly less efficent, but ligher and simpler than adding adding mechanical (flywheel, CVT, clutch) or electrical (generator, battery, motor) regenerative systems.

    A strange steam system that I have theorised about is direct production of very hot pressurised steam by stoichiometric combustion of hydrogen under pressure. Not intended for continous steam production but only for starting up and until a conventional boiler is hot enough to take over . Gases recharged by a Hofman voltameter which keeps the H2 and 02 gas streams seperated. If fed compressed water, the gases will be compressed to same pressure as the input water (more efficent to compress liquid than gas). May be a way of producing ultra clean water from tap water, or even byproducts of the combustion of hydrocarbon fuel

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s